Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Iron Fan
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. I'm closing this as NC, but then as a regular editor I'm going to redirect it because it contains no sources at all and claims no notability - it's just a plot. Black Kite (talk) 08:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Princess Iron Fan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:35, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Per the recent redirects of Fake Sun Wukong and Bai Gu Jing. Article "lacks independent third party sources, as per WP:GNG." Bonkers The Clown (talk) 13:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. As with related discussions, this one should satisfy notability criteria. Homunculus (duihua) 22:19, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps, but it's currently painfully unWikified and looks like a high school fankid wrote it. Also (key question): where are the sources? TheSoundAndTheFury (talk) 20:51, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:ITSNOTABLE. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:12, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:02, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:14, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 19:49, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yup. WP:ITSNOTABLE. Please elaborate as to why its notable. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 03:28, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.